E-MONEV Academic Year of 2019/2020 (Even)

Primary tabs

Submitted by admin on Wed, 2021-06-09 13:32


Master of Mechanical Engineering Education

  • Year of 2019 (Even)
  •  at the End of Lecture
# Lecturer Average Total Actions
       
1 Sudji Munadi
4.48
 11 Detail
2 Sudiyatno
4.50
 11 Detail
3 Bernadus Sentot Wijanarka
4.61
 11 Detail
4 Mujiyono
4.42
 11 Detail
5 Widarto
4.52
 11 Detail
6 Wagiran
4.29
 11 Detail
7 Apri Nuryanto
4.56
 11 Detail
8 TIM_THESIS_DESERTASI_PASCA
4.92
 4 Detail
 
  • Sangat Tinggi (4.48) (4.48)
  • 77 angket terisi.
# Scale Rating
1 4.21 - 5 Very High
2 3.41 - 4.20 High
3 2.61 - 3.40 Moderate
4 1.81 - 2.61 Low
5 0 - 1.80 Very Low
 
# Instrumen Average
     
1 Suitability of learning with Semester Lesson Plans (RPS) 4.68
2 The failure of lecturers in delivering material in lectures 4.64
3 The ability of lecturers to motivate students in lectures 4.52
4 Lecturer's mastery of lecture material in general 4.64
5 The meaning of the lecture material with the profession to be pursued 4.53
6 Clarity of lecturers in explaining lecture material materi 4.56
7 Effective use of time in lectures 4.35
8 Appropriateness of media and tools used in lectures 4.40
9 Completeness of teaching materials used by lecturers 4.40
10 Use of up to date technology in lectures 4.36
11 Lecturer's response in responding to student questions and opinions 4.51
12 The suitability of the feedback given by the lecturer in learning 4.36
13 Variations in assignment and assessment by Lecturers 4.34
14 The suitability of the exam with the material presented by the Lecturer 4.48
15 Lecturer's concern for student difficulties 4.47
  • Sangat Tinggi (4.92) (4.92)
  • 4 angket terisi.
# Scale Rating
1 4.21 - 5 Very High
2 3.41 - 4.20 High
3 2.61 - 3.40 Moderate
4 1.81 - 2.61 Low
5 0 - 1.80 Very Low
 
# Instrumen Average
     
1 Adequacy of study programs in organizing pre-proposal briefing. 4.75
2 The suitability of the final project with the lecturer's umbrella research. 4.75
3 Scheduling by the lecturer on the process of supervising the completion of the final project. 5.00
4 The use of guidance books/cards in the final project is monitored by using guidance books/cards. 5.00
5 The quality of the validation process in the completion of the final project. 5.00
6 Ease of communicating with supervisors. 5.00
7 Support from lecturers in providing solutions to problems in completing the final project. 5.00
8 The lecturer's accuracy in the revision results in the process of writing the final project. 5.00
9 Support from supervisors in helping students to obtain appropriate and up-to-date library resources. 5.00
10 The adequacy of the intensity of the meeting with the supervisor in completing the final project. 5.00
11 Guidance of supervisors to students to avoid plagiarism in writing the final project. 4.75
12 Monitoring of study programs on the progress of completing the final project (for example there are meetings involving students and supervisors as well as study programs). 4.75