Lecture Monitoring and Evaluation

Primary tabs

Submitted by admin on Tue, 2021-06-08 13:27



Master of Mechanical Engineering Education
#
Lecturer
Average Score
Number of Questionnaires
Actions
1
Thomas Sukardi
4.36
9
2
Dwi Rahdiyanta
4.36
9
3
Zainur Rofiq
4.29
9
4
Bernadus Sentot Wijanarka
4.35
20
5
Wagiran
4.31
9
6
Sutopo
4.39
9
7
TIM_THESIS_DESERTASI_PASCA
4.23
33
 
Performance of All Lecturers Based on Assessment Points
 
  • Very High (4.35)
  • 85 questionnaires filled.
#
Scale
Rating
1
4.21 - 5.00
Very High
2
3.41 - 4.20
High
3
2.61 - 3.40
Moderate
4
1.81 - 2.61
Low
5
0 - 1.80
Very Low
Showing 1-10 of 10 items.
#
Instrumen
Average
1
 Clarity of learning objectives
4.45
2
Clarity of the scope of the lecture material
4.33
3
Clarity of the meaning/importance of courses to graduate competencies
4.40
4
Clarity of activities that must be carried out by students in the lecture process
4.29
5
Clarity of learning media that will be used during lectures
4.33
6
Clarity of reference sources referred to in lectures (textbooks, electronic books, journals, etc.)
4.28
7
Clarity of tasks to be completed in lectures
4.36
8
Clarity on how to assess learning outcomes
4.35
9
Clarity on aspects/components of the assessment
4.39
10
Clarity of rules (attendance rules, ethics, sanctions) in the lecture process
4.28
 
 
  • High (4.04)
  •  13 questionnaires filled.
#
Scale
Rating
1
4.21 - 5
Sangat Tinggi
2
3.41 - 4.20
Tinggi
3
2.61 - 3.40
Sedang
4
1.81 - 2.61
Rendah
5
0 - 1.80
Sangat Rendah
 
Showing 1-12 of 12 items.
#
Instrumen
Average
1
Adequacy of study programs in organizing pre-proposal briefing.
4.31
2
The suitability of the final project with the lecturer's umbrella research.
4.08
3
Scheduling by the lecturer on the process of guiding the completion of the final project.
4.15
4
The use of guidance books/cards in the final project is monitored by using guidance books/cards.
3.46
5
The quality of the validation process in the completion of the final project.
4.15
6
Ease of communicating with supervisors.
4.31
7
Support from lecturers in providing solutions to problems in completing the final project.
4.23
8
The lecturer's accuracy in the revision results in the process of writing the final project.
4.31
9
Support from supervisors in helping students to obtain appropriate and up-to-date library resources.
3.69
10
The adequacy of the intensity of the meeting with the supervisor in completing the final project.
4.15
11
Guidance of supervisors to students to avoid plagiarism in writing the final project.
3.69
12
Monitoring of study programs on the progress of completing the final project (for example there are meetings involving students and supervisors and study programs).
3.92